Key Findings
- Executive Order directly intervenes in areas traditionally managed by Congress and administrative agencies (Department of Commerce).
- Centralized decision-making power vested in the Secretary of Commerce, with limited input from other agencies beyond consultation.
- Emphasis on 'American First' policies and protectionist measures, potentially at the expense of international agreements and trade norms.
- Use of executive authority to override existing regulations and potentially circumvent legislative processes.
Most Concerning Aspect
Centralized control over fisheries management and trade, bypassing established checks and balances.
Evidence
"“By the authority vested in me as President…” (Section 1)"
"“The Secretary of Commerce…shall immediately consider suspending, revising, or rescinding regulations…” (Section 4(a))"
"“The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall develop and implement an America First Seafood Strategy…” (Section 4(d))"
"“The Secretery of Commeerc shall examine the relevant trade practices of major seafood-producing nations, including with regard to IUU fishing and the use of forced labor in the seafood supply chain, and consider appropriate responses…” (Section 4(f))"